My lecture at Case Western Reserve University
I was recently
invited to discuss my life in East Cleveland with the students of a course
being taught at Case Western Reserve University. The course title is HSTY 381/481 : City As
Classroom: Inner cities, racial equity and social justice. Professor: Dr. Rhonda Y. Williams. I made my presentation on Thursday, September
6, 2012. The class consisted of
approximately fifteen students. Most of
those students were not from the Cleveland area. The group included undergraduates and
graduate students. All the students were
told to read my blog prior to my presentation.
My talk was intended to introduce the students to East Cleveland and
tell them something about the historical background of the community. For the rest of the semester they will be
working with the professor and community agencies in East Cleveland on
community development projects in East Cleveland
INTRODUCTION
My
first question, when Professor Williams asked me to talk to you about my life
in East Cleveland, was “what are the philosophy and objectives for the course
and its students. The answer to that
question is contained in your course syllabus.
I saw immediately that I can only speak to some of those objectives. The portion of the course philosophy to which
I will direct my remarks is historical.
As stated in your syllabus on page 2, I will try to address the
following issues:
1.
Historical development of cities and inner ring suburbs.
2.
Daily living conditions.
3.
Race and economics.
Although
my blog has not yet addressed the topic, I will also talk about some of the
issues of racial change, which first arose in East Cleveland during the
1960s. During that decade I lived in
East Cleveland and Cleveland Heights. My
work in city and county government during that period provided an opportunity
to study issues of racial and economic change throughout Cuyahoga County.
After
I have told you how things were during my life in East Cleveland, you will
quickly turn to issues of life in East Cleveland today and tomorrow. I hope my blog and some of the things I tell
you here today help you deal with the challenges for the East Cleveland of the
future.
Historical Background
As
I stated in the title of my blog, I remember East Cleveland as a fine place to
live, learn and enjoy my youth. My
parents remembered it that way too.
Evidence of that is the fact that they chose to stay in the East
Cleveland School District, when we needed to move to a larger house in
1953.
Another
local author, George Havens, feels the same way although he is about 15 years
older than me and writes about East Cleveland during the 1920s and 1930s. His book, which I cite in my blog, is titled
“A Special Time, A Special Place: East Cleveland Remembered. My discussions with George Havens and others
of his generation have convinced me that East Cleveland was indeed special
during the entire period from its founding in the early part of the Twentieth
Century through the middle of that century.
I also believe that the things, which made it special, were built into
the fabric of that community.
What
is a community? In my blog I talk about
my several block neighborhood near Shaw and Plymouth as my community. I also state that East Cleveland had several
communities based upon the elementary school districts. Some communities are based upon geography as
well. The area on the hill is divided by
that geological separation from the rest of East Cleveland. My second East Cleveland community was the
Caledonia area. I lived on Nela View
only a mile from Shaw High School and my old Plymouth Place neighborhood. But it was in many ways quite different. I will be writing more about that period of
my life in future blog postings.
Sometimes we refer to our churches and other organizations as a
community.
East Cleveland itself can be viewed as a community. Back in my time we had the annual East Cleveland Community Picnic at Euclid Beach Park. Yes there were things, which united all those smaller communities I just mentioned. They were the things, which made East Cleveland a true community and not just a batch of fiefdoms and power centers. We were all proud to be East Clevelanders.
Why East Cleveland?
In
many ways East Cleveland is an historical accident. It is what was left of East Cleveland and
Euclid Townships when Cleveland stopped annexing other communities on the East
Side. The annexed communities of
Glenville and Collinwood and the City of Cleveland Heights are on the borders
of East Cleveland. Geographic logic might
say that those parts of East Cleveland on top of the hill are more
appropriately a part of Cleveland Heights.
There is very little difference between East Cleveland and its City of
Cleveland communities of Glenville and Collinwood. However, don’t try to tell that to anyone at
the Shaw football game with Glenville, Collinwood or Heights.
A
major factor in the formation of East Cleveland was the municipal home rule
movement at the beginning of the 20th century. In Ohio, that movement led to a 1912 Home
Rule amendment to the State Constitution.
As a result Cleveland lost the ability to annex communities and those
areas, which were still unincorporated, were encouraged to become
municipalities. East Cleveland actually
incorporated as a village in 1895 and adopted a home rule charter in 1918. By that time the population had reached
27,000 and continued to grow to about 40,000 by 1930. That was the stable population level of the
city for the rest of the period in which I lived there. It was a fortunate combination of the form of
government adopted in that City Charter and other social and economic factors,
which made East Cleveland a special place.
Government
East
Cleveland was a product of the progressive era of government reform. The progressives believed that government
should be run as a business by professional managers. Those managers would hire other professionals
to manage the various departments of government in order to provide services to
the citizens of their community.
Government would be selected on a non partisan basis, the theory being
that there is no Democrat or Republican way to clean the streets or collect
garbage. In the case of East Cleveland, voters
elected a five member City Commission.
Those five people would select a professional City Manager, who would
manage the affairs of the City. A strong
civil service system protected the rights of city employees and eliminated the
partisan patronage, which was prominent in most municipal governments of the
day. City services were provided by the
following departments: health, welfare, recreation, law, police, fire, water,
engineering and building, parks, service waste disposal and electrical. The City Commission also appointed a
professional Finance Director and various boards and commissions. Service was efficient and the needs of the
citizens were met.
There
was also an elected five member School Board.
That board set policy and hired a professional educator to run the
schools. The School Board also appointed
a seven member Library Board. During my
time in East Cleveland there were only two City Managers. The first was Charles Carran and the second
was Grant Apthorp. Mr. Apthorp served as
Finance Director while Mr. Carran was City Manager.
Finally, the voters selected a Judge of the East Cleveland Municipal Court. During my life in East Cleveland, there was only one Judge. His name was Stanton Adams. He was still there long after I left town. He had the reputation of being quite strict but fair in enforcing the law.
The
tradition of a well run, nonpartisan, government was embodied in the original
City Charter and carried out by dedicated professional managers resulting in a
sound and stable government that served the citizens well. I don’t remember any major political issues
or political battles. The citizens were
basically happy with their community and its services and the form of
government.
The Business Community
There
were close links among the East Cleveland business community, the citizens and
the government. East Cleveland citizens
were highly dependent upon local merchants for the daily needs of their
families. Those merchants were equally
dependent upon the citizens for their livelihoods. Both the citizens and the merchants needed
good government and schools. Merchants
were some of the best known people in the neighborhood and often took an
interest in serving their community. They served in appointed or elected
community jobs such as Library Board, Selective Service Board, PTA groups,
etc. They also organized the annual East
Cleveland Community Picnic at Euclid Beach Park. Their direct contact with customers made them
extremely visible to the community. They also appeared in patron advertisements
in School Yearbooks, football programs and in the weekly community newspaper,
The East Cleveland Leader. My blog
gives several examples of business leaders, who served the community.
Living Conditions and Economics
You
can think of this issue in relation to my parent’s decision to purchase their
first house and raise a family in East Cleveland. Those reasons may be similar to those of most
families in East Cleveland at that time and perhaps to today’s families as well. To put that in perspective, I will tell you a
little about my family.
I
and most of my contemporaries are products of the Great Depression and World
War II. We are not baby boomers. That group was born after 1946. We experienced the depression and the war
through our parents’ lives and the hardships they faced. When
dad graduated from high school in 1932, the country was in the middle of the
Great Depression and it was difficult to find work. He did whatever he could to help support the
family. By 1936 he had found a job at
National Acme Company located at E 131 and Coit. That was also the year that he met my mother,
whom he married in 1938. They moved to a
small apartment on Hayden Avenue just on the Collinwood side of the border with
East Cleveland.
By
1940 mom and dad needed to look for a bigger place to live, because I was
expected to arrive later that year. They
had to find a place to live and raise their new family. I’m sure they asked the same questions that
home buyers ask today such as: How much
can we afford? How close to work can I
be? What are the neighborhood amenities? Is the school system good?
East
Cleveland was a logical choice for their house hunting. It is next door to the community with which
they were familiar (Collinwood). The
city had a good reputation for its community resources such as schools, parks,
and shopping. There was also a large
supply of available homes that they might be able to afford. The next decision concerned whether to rent
or buy. Dad came from a tradition of
home ownership. Therefore the main
question was how to find a home, which they could afford to buy. They decided that they should buy a two
family home so that the rent from one suite would help them pay the mortgage,
taxes and other expense related to home ownership. They found the home of my childhood on the
corner of Shaw and Plymouth Place. Dad
decided to convert the attic to a third living space so that we could live on
the third floor and rent out the first and second floor suites. Since East Cleveland zoning and building
codes were very strict about such conversions, Dad had to present his plans to
City Hall and obtain a rooming house permit before making the renovations.
I’m
not sure whether our family would have been considered lower middle class or
middle class, when we lived in East Cleveland.
Dad had a factory job in the maintenance department of National Acme
Company. According to W2 forms that I
have, his annual pay was $1,104.81 in 1936.
That rose to $2,173.78 by 1939. I
don’t know how that compared with other East Cleveland homeowners at that
time. From my perspective, I never felt
that we were poor. I never felt
deprived. I didn’t get everything I
asked for; but what I did get always seemed to be adequate. I never knew how much my dad made and never
considered whether that was more or less than the other fathers made. To me my friends and I seemed to be in the
same economic class. Perhaps our family
would have been classified as blue collar based upon Dad’s job and income
level.
Many
East Cleveland citizens had an economic profile similar to ours. The industrial and manufacturing plants
within walking or public transit distance were major employers. In 1950 38% of East Cleveland’s work force
was involved in manufacturing. The total
male work force was almost equally divided between white collar and blue collar
jobs. The figures for females were 76%
white collar and 24% blue collar.
Race and Ethnicity
While
the East Cleveland population was ethnically diverse during my life there, I
don’t remember anyone of African/American descent (or as we called them,
Negroes) living there. I don’t know what
the politically correct term is today, but I’ll call them Blacks. It was a fact of life in those days that
different ethnic and/or racial groups lived in ethnic or racially defined
sections of town. For example, the
Polish lived at 55th and Fleet, the Slovenians lived at 55th
and St. Clair, the Irish lived on the West Side and Blacks lived in the Scovil Avenue
area on the east side of Cleveland.
There was no German area, because we Germans had been so thoroughly
assimilated by that time. So with the
exception of Blacks, East Cleveland was an ethnically diverse community.
Shaw
High School class lists and yearbook pictures provide a good way to view that
diversity. You will not see any Black
faces. But you will see Italian, Irish
and any number of European ethnic last names.
We had a very strong Catholic School system in East Cleveland and many
of my friends went to Catholic school, mostly at Christ The King. The important thing is that I (and I believe
most of my friends also) never thought about people as being in an ethnic
category. It only occurred to me after I
had left the community that the Probst family was German and the Murphys were
Irish. Italian names were easier to
identify. We had many Italian families
in the area of East Cleveland near Little Italy and around Lakeview Cemetery. There was also a large Italian population in
Collinwood, which spilled over into East Cleveland.
One
group, which I didn’t mention above are the Jews. I have to admit that I never gave a thought
to who might be Jewish. As it turns out,
many of my classmates were Jewish and I didn’t know it. Two of my friends with whom I played baseball
in the field at the end of Plymouth Place were named Stu and Jerry. It was much later that I put two and two
together and realized that they were Jewish from their last names (Kaufman and
Goldman). Someone once told me that the
Tobin brothers, who ran the Tobin Drug Store, were Jewish. My response was, “so what?”
Here
I must reluctantly admit that my paternal Grandparents and my father were
somewhat prejudiced against Blacks and Jews.
Fortunately, my mother was a paragon of tolerance and I followed her
example in life. I can remember being
very young and taking a streetcar ride downtown. Somewhere west of University Circle some Black
passengers got on the car. It was my
first encounter with Black people. Mom told me not to stare, because they were
people just like us even though they looked different. I later learned that Mom’s best girlfriends
when she was in high school were a Black girl and a Jewish girl. After leaving East Cleveland, I became active
in the fair housing and racial integration movement in Cleveland Heights. Sadly, I have to admit that my level of
racial tolerance was not practiced by most of my East Cleveland
contemporaries. In 1968 I was a
candidate for State Representative from East Cleveland. I remember meeting a former classmate, who
still lived in the Caledonia neighborhood.
He said he only had one question, “How are you going to keep the (N
word) out of East Cleveland?” Too many
white East Cleveland citizens had that concern.
For that and other reasons, I believe integration was doomed from the
start.
It
is my view that integration failed in East Cleveland, because neither group
really wanted it to succeed. The white
population fled the city due to fear and ignorance. They had been conditioned by the examples of Hough
and Glenville. In those sections of
Cleveland white flight led to all Black communities. I remember classmates, who had moved from
Glenville to East Cleveland in order to avoid going to Glenville High
School. Some of them probably used false
addresses to get into Shaw instead of Glenville. These fears were exacerbated by the block
busting tactics of the Real Estate profession.
Some of the worst practitioners of block busting were the Black real
estate agents. In a way, who could blame
them? Sales mean money, whether you are
Black or White. Black citizens were simply living the
American dream of finding a good home in a good community. Integration was not their primary goal. They wanted the same things, which brought my
parents to East Cleveland. I also
believe that some in the Black political establishment saw East Cleveland as a
future base of power as a Black run City, a first in Cuyahoga County.
The
above are only my opinions, because I have not made a study of the process of
racial change subsequent to the 1960s. I
only experienced the beginning of that change.
As students, you will be working with East Cleveland as it is
today. The final part of my presentation
will focus on the things that I think were special about East Cleveland and
would be important to any community today.
Conclusion
Here
I will go back to the reasons my parents chose East Cleveland in 1940. People looking for a community today would be
looking for similar things.
1.
Access to employment. This means something different today. Most people don’t walk to work as my father
did. However, good public transportation
is important to those without an automobile.
Good public transportation is an important asset for East Cleveland. Although there are few opportunities in
manufacturing today, one of the Cleveland area’s major centers of employment is
University Circle on the border of East Cleveland. Close ties with that area seem natural to the
future development of the community.
2.
An inventory of good and reasonably priced
houses and apartments is essential.
The current stock of housing seems to be depleted and in poor
condition. That can be overcome. The best example of that is the rebuilding of
Europe after WWII. In this country
during the 1960s many cities tore down old and dilapidated housing and
redevelop the areas. That was known as
urban renewal. That process doesn’t have
to be done by government alone. Private
enterprise will carry that out in cooperation with government as long as there
is a market for the product.
3.
Government.
A community needs a stable and responsive government, which provides
essential services in an economical fashion. The City Manager form worked well
in my time. Other forms of government
can work too. This requires an informed
and active citizenry to work with the elected officials.
4.
A strong business community is essential. In my day the local merchants were more
essential to families that they are today.
Our increased mobility today results in trips to regional shopping
centers instead of the local businesses?
In spite of that, the economy of the city will be dependent upon a
strong and successful business community.
A close partnership among the citizens, business and government helped
make East Cleveland special then and it will help now.
5.
Good schools are essential. This may be the most important item of
all. Remember that my family stayed in
East Cleveland primarily for the school system.
All the school buildings that I knew have been replaced. I haven’t been in any of them, but I am sure
that they are better than the ones I attended.
However, buildings alone do not determine the quality of education. It takes an informed and active citizenry as
well as good school management and faculty to be successful.
6.
Good community services and facilities. This topic is very important and is a logical
outcome of the first five items. It
takes a stable and involved citizenry, good government and an active and
supportive business community to provide the things which citizens want. Some of these things already exist. East Cleveland has good parks and recreation
facilities. However, it will take a
fully developed and financially stable community to maintain and further
develop those assets in the future.
That
is the conclusion of my presentation.
Thank you for taking an interest in my writing and listening to my presentation
tonight. I will be happy to answer any
questions you have at this time.
Questions
and Answers
During
the question period there was some discussion of my experiences with urban
renewal during the 1960s. My first job
after graduating from Western Reserve University in 1963 was with the Chicago
Regional Office of the federal Housing and Home Finance Agency (HHFA). That was the organization, which later became
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In
my capacity as an Urban Renewal Field Representative, I worked with several
Ohio cities, which were applying for federal grants to fund urban renewal
projects. That included work with the
City of Cleveland on several projects including the University Euclid Project
and Erieview. The former was intended to
solve the problems of the Hough area and the latter was a downtown
redevelopment project.
I
explained that the concept of Urban Renewal that the federal government and I
were promoting at that time was a failure.
That program failed for many reasons, the main reason being that it did
not solve the underlying problems of urban blight and the related problems of poverty,
crime, drug abuse, etc. Often by
focusing on slum clearance these programs simply moved the problems to another
location. Professor Williams made the
point that urban renewal often became Black removal.
I
pointed out that downtown was ultimately redeveloped by private enterprise in
cooperation with city government. The
massive infusions of federal money in the 1960s only gave us an ugly office
tower at 12th and St.Clair. The
Hough area bordering University Circle is coming back from its period of blight
and despair. That process has been the
result of private development in cooperation with City government rather than
the process envisioned by the Urban Renewal project of the 1960s.
One
student asked me how the process of urban redevelopment could work in East
Cleveland now and how East Cleveland differs from the outer suburbs in that regard. I referenced my experience as a planner with
the Cuyahoga County Regional Planning Commission during the 1960s. In that capacity I was involved in planning
for the development of what amounted to new cities. We worked with cities like Solon, which at that
time had a lot of vacant land and was destined to become a large City. The city officials had an opportunity to plan
for a balanced community with the optimum mix of residential, business,
industrial and other land uses. They
could plan the number and location of community facilities such as schools, parks
and recreation centers. In the 45 years
since we embarked upon that planning effort, Solon has developed into a large
well balanced community with excellent community facilities and a strong tax
base.
East
Cleveland never had the opportunity to plan the same way that Solon did. It was from the beginning a small and compact
land area surrounded by Cleveland and Cleveland Heights. It developed quickly in the early part of the
20th century primarily as a bedroom community for the industrial and
manufacturing areas nearby. That worked
well for many years. Two things led to
the failure of that community model.
l. First
was the collapse of the manufacturing base of employment. That process affected the entire Midwest and
created what we now call the rustbelt.
The entire Cleveland Area has had to adapt to a new kind of
economy. We have moved from being a
center of manufacturing to a post industrial economy. Economic development and employment are now
focused on things like technology, medical and service industries. Older workers need to be retrained and new
workers will need different skills to find employment now and in the
future.
2. Second the sudden and dramatic racial change,
which started in the 1960s created a new type of community. At first that change didn’t make a lot of
difference. The first Black families in
East Cleveland were primarily middle class and had values and life styles
similar to the White families, who were fleeing. Some
of the more enlightened White families adapted to the new ethnic mix. However, the racial change along with the
change in the economic base discussed in point one created the conditions,
which led to the East Cleveland of today.
Middle class Black families left East Cleveland and now live in suburbs
like Beachwood. That is good news,
because it means that our efforts to promote racial equality have been
successful. However, that did not help
the poor and powerless Blacks, who are now living in East Cleveland. The problem was more than white flight. It was the flight of the entire middle class
population, which made East Cleveland what it is today.
I
ended the question period with the following observation. I think East Cleveland is now in a chicken
and egg situation. In order to become an
economically viable community the city will have to attract a large base of taxpaying
citizens and businesses. In order to
attract people the way East Cleveland attracted my family, an adequate supply
of sound affordable housing must exist.
Good schools and community facilities are also essential. The dilemma is that a tax base of 17,000 economically
depressed people will not support the development needed to make East Cleveland
viable again. The final question
is: how do you serve the needs of 17,000
poor Black people and still develop a community of 40,000 people with a strong
tax base and good amenities? Furthermore,
how do you do that and still promote racial equity and social justice, the main
goals of the course. That, I told the students, is the problem they
will be working on for the rest of the semester. It is a tough problem and I’m not sure I have
a good answer.
Some Final Thoughts
Consideration of Merger with Cleveland and/or Cleveland Heights
That
was the end of my presentation. In
retrospect I have had a few thoughts that I will include here for what they are
worth. I really have to go back to my original
question, why East Cleveland. As much as
it pains me to say it, there may not be a reason for the City of East Cleveland
today. In fact the very existence of the
City of East Cleveland may be a barrier to solving the problems of the area
known as East Cleveland. I already
pointed out the similarities of sections of East Cleveland with the neighboring
cities. The problems of the economically
depressed population of East Cleveland are more appropriately the problems of
the entire Cleveland metropolitan area.
If the area of East Cleveland were a part of Cleveland and/or Cleveland
Heights, the current concentration of economically depressed people could be
absorbed by the larger tax base of those communities or Cuyahoga County. The barriers to land development within the
current boundaries of East Cleveland would be lowered. I even believe that East Cleveland as it
exists today is no longer a viable power base for the Black political
establishment, if it ever was in the first place.
Failure of the East Cleveland Public Library to merge with the Cuyahoga County Library
An example of my above proposal concerns the East Cleveland Library. That fine institution is currently trying to serve a population in great need of its services. It must do that with very limited financial resources. There was a recent effort to have the East Cleveland Public Library absorbed into the Cuyahoga County Public Library system. That Cuyahoga County system is one of the best in the United States. It serves my present community of Beachwood quite well. For reasons I do not understand, a majority of the East Cleveland Library Board turned down the offer of the Cuyahoga County Public Library. In my opinion the citizens of East Cleveland lost a lot by that decision. If the county library serves communities like Beachwood well, it could provide equally fine service to East Cleveland with the advantages of the larger county tax base. The offer was a gamble for the county, because the expense of the East Cleveland system would probably exceed the additional revenue collected from East Cleveland residents. However, the county would probably have provided better services at a lower cost due to efficiencies and economy of scale. In any case this was an opportunity lost.
An example of my above proposal concerns the East Cleveland Library. That fine institution is currently trying to serve a population in great need of its services. It must do that with very limited financial resources. There was a recent effort to have the East Cleveland Public Library absorbed into the Cuyahoga County Public Library system. That Cuyahoga County system is one of the best in the United States. It serves my present community of Beachwood quite well. For reasons I do not understand, a majority of the East Cleveland Library Board turned down the offer of the Cuyahoga County Public Library. In my opinion the citizens of East Cleveland lost a lot by that decision. If the county library serves communities like Beachwood well, it could provide equally fine service to East Cleveland with the advantages of the larger county tax base. The offer was a gamble for the county, because the expense of the East Cleveland system would probably exceed the additional revenue collected from East Cleveland residents. However, the county would probably have provided better services at a lower cost due to efficiencies and economy of scale. In any case this was an opportunity lost.